Family Law Attorneys Fight for Families

About Me

Family Law Attorneys Fight for Families

Many parents fail to realize that they are still co-parents even after a divorce. This means no matter what their feelings are toward each other, their goals should always be geared toward the best interests of their children. I am an attorney practicing family law, and I see parents every day who have forgotten that children should always come first. I hope that this blog will remind people that kids can be terribly hurt when their parents get divorced and that it is up to the adults in their lives to provide a secure foundation where they can feel safe and know that they are cared for. Children are often innocent victims of divorce. Learn how to protect your kids.

Latest Posts

Breach Of Contract — Why Dispute Resolution May Be The Best Choice
25 May 2023

Has a contract you entered into been breached by t

What To Look For In A Guardianship Lawyer
20 April 2023

Guardianships can be complex but often necessary w

Envisioning Your Estate Plan
10 February 2023

Before speaking to an estate lawyer, spend some ti

Why You Should Hire A Car Accident Injury Attorney Sooner Than Later
10 February 2023

If you were injured in a car accident and you beli

Has Someone Sued You For Theft? Here's What You Need To Know
12 January 2023

Theft charges usually encompass crimes involving s


Understanding The Hearsay Rule

A lot of what lawyers do involves arguing about what can and can't be used as evidence in a case. If you're going to court anytime soon, it helps to understand some of the terminology and rules that are being used. By understanding more about the hearsay rule, and its exceptions, you'll be able to follow along better with the proceedings. This is what you should know.

What's the hearsay rule?

Hearsay is basically unsubstantiated or unverifiable evidence that comes to the court "secondhand." Instead of being what a witness saw or heard, it's what a witness was told by somebody else.

For example, if Adam takes a drink of whiskey while driving a car with Barbara as a passenger, Barbara could testify in court that she saw Adam drinking whiskey while driving before he caused a fatal traffic accident. However, if Barbara tells Corey what Adam did, Corey cannot testify about it, even if he believes it's the truth. His information only came through secondhand knowledge, or hearsay.

Why is this so important?

The hearsay rule generally prevents evidence of this sort from being used in court because otherwise it would have to allow people to testify to essentially nothing more than rumors that they've heard. Not only does this keep rumors out of the courtroom, it preserves a defendant's Constitutional right to confront his or her accuser in court and to subject that person to cross-examination.

That can be critical to anyone's defense. For example, if Barbara testifies that she watched Adam pull out the whiskey and drink it, Adam's attorney may be able to cast doubt on what Barbara actually saw. The attorney could make Barbara go into detail about how she knew that what Adam was drinking was actually whiskey. If it was in a flask, for example, she may have assumed it was whiskey because she knew that was Adam's drink of choice. She may never have actually asked. If Corey were allowed to testify to what Barbara told him, the defense attorney would be unable to determine the basis of Barbara's knowledge.

What are the exceptions?

Like many rules of law, the hearsay rule has a number of general exceptions, which include things like:

  • the original witness is unable to testify for an unavoidable reason, like death or physical illness

  • the original evidence was given at a previous trial and is already on record

  • the witness made a statement believing that he or she was about to die

  • the defendant somehow caused the original witness to be unable to attend the trial

  • the defense agrees to the validity of the evidence in advance

  • the statement was an excited utterance made in response to a shocking, sudden event

Sometimes secondhand information can get into court because of an important exception known as a "declaration against interest." This is a type of statement that is presumed to be true simply because it adversely affects the speaker in a serious way. For example, if Barbara told Corey that she helped Adam hide the whiskey bottle from the police after the accident, that might be considered a statement against interest, because that would make Barbara an accessory to a crime.

It is important to note that hearsay rules and exceptions are often hotly contested in court and the laws keep changing as a result. That can make hearsay an important issue both at a trial and on appeal in any case. For more information about this and other legal matters, talk to an attorney, such as Vandeventer Black LLP.